To draw on the current phraseology of hospital management-types, it boils down to culture. Hospitals with lower mortality rates, I suspect, aggressively engender a culture of high expectations, where everyone down the line understands how important of a role they play on the team. High expectations come with accountability, and the squishiness of some administrators when it comes to meting out that accountability can lead to poor outcomes. That accountability must also apply to the physicians, and a physician culture that demands the best for our patients in our hospitals --- from the physicians and staff alike --- pays big dividends.
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
The Importance Of Hospital Culture, And How Much More Likely Are You To Survive As Happy's Patient?
________________________________ 13 OutburstsHow Fast Can A Bear Run?
________________________________ 3 OutburstsI was told by several bystanders, the bear can run up to 35 miles per hour. A good reason why the laws in the Yellowstone are post 100 yards as the closest allowable distance to approach a bear. On several occasions whole herds of wild humans would congregate on the side of the road to view the bears in action. And everyone kept their distance. At least 100 yards.
Here we all were. About 50 of us all standing back, well over 100 yards, with our cameras at maximum zoom. And Mr. Bear Food walks farther and farther and farther, finally resting up against a tree no more than 30 yards from the hungry bear. Everyone is yelling at him to get back. He's just smiling away. Mr. Bear Food had no idea how many people had their video camera on trigger waiting for a chance to get a real life bear attack in action. Whom ever you are Mr Bear Food,
today was your lucky day.
Is It Time To Shut Down Medical Schools In Favor of Nursing School?
________________________________ 6 OutburstsDr Rich gives his in depth analysis of the news behind the AMNews.
While apparently Mary Mundinger (DrPH, RN, dean of the Columbia University School of Nursing, President of CACC, and bugaboo of physicians everywhere) did not make herself available to the AMANews for a direct response, she was quoted in an earlier article as saying, “If nurses can show they can pass the same test at the same level of competency, there’s no rational argument for reimbursing them at a lower rate or giving them less authority in caring for patients.”
How Does A 98 Year Old Present To The ED?
________________________________ 4 Outbursts
I snapped this picture in a public ED. I could hear the lady checking in. She's 98 year's old. And she presented to the ED by private auto. Wheeled up to the front desk. Checked in. And waited her turn in line.
The Supreme Court Rules It's Illegal To Discriminate Against Whites
________________________________ 2 OutburstsWhy did it take the Supreme Court to decide discrimination against whites was illegal?
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that white firefighters in New Haven, Conn., were unfairly denied promotions because of their race, reversing a decision that high court nominee Sonia Sotomayor endorsed as an appeals court judge.
New Haven was wrong to scrap a promotion exam because no African-Americans and only two Hispanic firefighters were likely to be made lieutenants or captains based on the results, the court said Monday in a 5-4 decision. The city said that it had acted to avoid a lawsuit from minorities.
Monday, June 29, 2009
Should Emergency Physicians Be Given Immunity From Lawsuits?
________________________________ 21 OutburstsChris Seper over at Medcity News discusses effort underway in his own backyard to do just that.
Ohio is the latest state to introduce new legislation that would dramatically increase the legal standard to win a civil suit against a doctor working at an emergency department. It also offers the same protection for doctors helping after floods, tornadoes or other disasters.
The bill says physicians would have qualified civil immunity while working in emergency rooms and be subject only to lawsuits if they showed “willful or wanton misconduct” — a high standard for liability usually reserved to determine punitive damages.
Emergency room physicians are protected already, as long as they act within the concept of the standard of care, and don’t deserve an exception beyond what other physicians receive, Lansdowne said. “They can be wrong, and as long as they act in accordance with standard of care, they are not liable,” he said.
How To Survive In Primary Care And It's Not By Playing Doctor
________________________________ 1 OutburstsIt is kind of sad that taking care of the whole patient and serving as a well trained comprehensive doctor is at the bottom of the desirability food chain of medicine. Hospitals and multi-specialty medical groups see primary care physicians as "lost leaders". We have become the "oil change" of medicine, so the big ticket "engine overhaul" can be captured by the high dollar procedures.
I Can Do CPR With One Hand Tied Behind My Back
________________________________ 1 OutburstsA Reanalysis Of Gawande's Research
________________________________ 0 OutburstsMcAllen, Texas is the mother ship for the Medicare National Bank. A culture of care that is bankrupting our country. Or so we think. The ladies and gents over at the Health Care Blog analyzed the data. And came to a very different conclusion.
McAllen is different from many areas of the United States: it is sicker and poorer. The observed differences in the rates of chronic disease are highest for those conditions rampant in low income American populations: diabetes and heart disease. Further, Medicare beneficiaries in McAllen have significantly higher rates of co-occurring chronic conditions. As a result the costs of caring for McAllen Medicare population appears high in comparison to other areas but not abnormally so. McAllen suffers from a tremendous burden, but it not caused by its physicians: the care they provide leads to costs that are substantially comparable to the other counties in the article once adjustments are made for the magnitude of the health problems they face. The disturbing pattern of physician practices uncovered by Dr. Gawande sounds a warning not because it foretells a McAllen-like future but because it portrays the on-going crisis that affects both McAllen and Grand Junction and it is national in scope. Physician culture is only part of the McAllen story.
They did some great analysis of the data to come to these conclusions. They showed that the expenditures out of McAllen in patients without diabetes, heart disease or heart failure was not out of the ordinary.
My own analysis? Before I could conclude that an over treat culture of care in McAllen doesn't exist, I would like to see the data, not on patients without these three diseases, but rather expenditure data on patients WITH diabetes, heart failure and heart disease and corrected for poor status (who's poor health is directly related to smoking status). These are the patients for which medical care is expensive. These are the proceduralized patients. Telling me that healthy folks in McAllen cost no more than healthy folks in Colorado doesn't mean anything. Tell me a rich diabetic with heart failure and a history of MI costs more in McAllen than in Colorado. Now, that's meaningful information.
Bizarre Brain Research: Optogenetics
________________________________ 0 OutburstsI reader pointed me to some crazy brain research. Optogenetics.
Optogenetics uses a brain cell switch with two genetic parts. The first is a gene taken from an algae that activates the cell in the presence of blue light in order to turn towards the light and photosynthesis. In a neuron, that activation fires the cell. The second is from an archaeon, a salt-based extremophile, which responds to yellow light by pumping chlorideions. In a brain cell, that means not firing at all.
I wonder how many RVU's that would pay?
Sunday, June 28, 2009
What's It Like To Be A Nurse?
________________________________ 20 Outbursts
My name is not Catharine. My name is "Nurse!" Not "Nurse?" Or "Nurse." But "Nurse!" Sometimes "Nuuurrrrsssse!!!!" That is what I'm called by the patients (if they can talk), their families, the doctors, social workers, dietitians, respiratory therapists, chaplains, visitors, physical therapists, everybody calls me "Nurse!" I'd sooner be called c*nt, b*tch, f*ckface or wh*re because calling me "Nurse!" amounts to a Master calling a slave. And slave I am.
And no one is just a nurse. For all the nurses out there, I respect the nursing work you do. It's one of the toughest jobs in health care. I for one could never do it.
I Got Offered $1000...
________________________________ 7 Outburststo give a "lecture" on Invanz. I was told I would be given the slides to do the lecture AND it would only take about 15 minutes.
It's not OK to give a doctor a pen, but it is OK to pay them a $1000 in consulting fees. I find this whole thing preposterous.
I turned them down due to my busy schedule. The question is, would you?
Keep Coming Back For More
________________________________ 8 OutburstsI'd like to thank my loyal readers for tuning in on all of my daily offerings. According to Google Analytics you keep coming back for more. In the last 30 days
15% of you have visited more than 100 times
17% of you have visited 25-100 times
13% of you have visited 5-25 times
In other words almost 1/2 of you keep coming back over and over again. Of the remaining 1/2, 30% of you have visited just once. All those poor people missing out on the truth...
100,000 Patients A Year Are Killed By Lack Of Ambu Access
________________________________ 6 OutburstsMichael Jackson is dead. In a follow up post I discussed the dangers of IV narcotics, praised nurses for preventing more deaths than I would expect with its use, discussed my own experience with the dangers of IV narcotics, and reported on my nurse coordinator's suspicion that MJ died at the hands of fibromyalgia.
In a follow up post, after an N=12 trial at Happy's hospital, I discussed the lack of critical access to life saving Ambu bags in patient rooms. I suggested that having Ambu bags in every room was not a standard practice in hospitals all across this bankrupt country of ours. The response has been overwhelmingly one of concern for the safety of patients at Happy's hospital. Concern that life saving access to Ambu bags is being compromised in favor of profit.
I took these concerns to heart. I spent all day yesterday researching outcomes data as it relates to having Ambu bags in patient rooms. What I found was shocking (like Dateline shocking). I am now a converted believer. I want to thank all my readers for my new crusade in life.
What I found was unacceptable in the magic of American health care. Study after study points to an epidemic of hospital acquired Ambu death. The literature suggested 125 randomized controlled trials comparing Ambu bags in the mop closet vs Ambu bags in every patient room. A meta-analysis of all trials, suggested that 100,000 hospitalized patients a year are dying due to lack of Ambu access.
Starting monday, I will be contacting all appropriate government agencies and major news organizations to let them know of this hospital crises sweeping America. And I will be starting my own organization, paid for with Ambu advertising, to push for a national quality initiative to put Ambus in every patient room in America.
And I shall call it Happy's Attempt At Helping Ambu Access
Saturday, June 27, 2009
Is It Reasonable To Stock Every Hospital Room With Emergency Rescusitation Supplies
________________________________ 37 OutburstsA post I wrote yesterday touched a nerve with many ghosts of the night. Many suggested I was failing my duties as a physician for leaving the bedside of a patient to gather the support team for resuscitation efforts, suggesting instead I should have started bagging the patient myself, while I yell outside for help. Or, (as I suggested a once in a lifetime experience)to pull the code blue chord myself.
So I took a little survey on my rounds today. I rounded on 15 patients today. Excluding my ICU patients, I counted the number of Ambu bags that were stocked in my other 12 patient rooms . I searched high and low. Room after room. I opened closets. I opened drawers. I searched every where. Guess how many I found.
Zero. Zip. Nadda. Zilch. Nul.
I talked with a respiratory therapist and asked him where they are. He said they are stocked in one supply closet on every floor. The only places they are stocked in every room are the ICU and the ED.
One reader suggested this was unacceptable hospital policy. That I should contact the "Vice President of Patient Care" to change such as dastardly policy as it represented a patient safety issue. I would suggest this reader has minimal exposure to inpatient medicine and the economics of inpatient medicine.
Stocking an Ambu bag in every room ain't gonna happen. It ain't gonna happen in just about every hospital in this country, except the really rich ones. It is not reasonable, nor rational to have a fully stocked ICU in every patient room of a hospital, in spite of what some wish to believe. I might also add that Happy's Hospital is a level one trauma center, cardiac center, cancer center, neurosurgical center, whatever center. You can get everything at Happy's hospital. I do not work at a rinky dink hospital in the middle of no where with one ventilator and a part time physician that only works M-F from 8am to noon. We have it all, and we don't stock Ambu bags. That is a reality. Because it is the right reality.
It's hard to bag someone without a bag. I'm ready to accept y'all apologies at any time. Those angry at me for not bagging the patient, have been lead astray by forces not familiar with inpatient medicine. If you want the truth on inpatient medicine, stick with me. If you want outsiders opinions on inpatient medicine, go somewhere else.
As for the nursing staff, Happy's nursing team did an excellent job that day saving that patient's life. I take great pleasure in knowing that many of them excel in their duties and responsibilities on their floor duties as a nurse, a job harder than just about every other field of medicine. I have great confidence in many of them for the expertise in nursing related patient care issues and I would trust most of them with my life.
Friday, June 26, 2009
Do You Treat Lawyer Patients Differently?
________________________________ 18 OutburstsIf a patient tells you they are a lawyer, how does that affect your evaluation process?
Be honest.
The Four Most Expensive Words In The Goat Rodeo Known As American Healthcare
________________________________ 10 OutburstsWhy does a 92-year-old man with less than a fifty-fifty chance of living another year get an expensive colonoscopy? I mean, it had better be a good reason. Rectal bleeding. Something like that.
“It was a screening colonoscopy,” said the consultant, “We removed a polyp.”
Michael Jackson May Have Died From Fibromyalgia
________________________________ 69 OutburstsThe Doctish English Phrase Book
________________________________ 4 OutburstsDr Hal Dal brings us an up to date explanation of what doctors really mean when they open their mouths.
My favorite You will experience some discomfort. (really means) This will hurt a lot.
America Responds: Who Is Responsible For Rising Health Care Costs?
________________________________ 2 OutburstsFrom the Economist.com (via PointofLaw.com via overlawyered's Twitter)
Insurance companies are to blame from 42% of respondants
Trial lawyers are to blame from 24% of the respondants
Washington is to blame from 20% of respondants.
Fascinating. Insurance companies (like every third party) isn't without its problems. But, exactly how are insurance companies to blame? When you wreck your Ford focus and it costs $1000 to repair the bumper, is that the fault of State Farm? Insurance companies collect money from you, take a small cut, and then pay for your neighbor with the 30 medical problems to sit on her couch smoke cigarettes, eat Cheetos and watch Oprah.
The public has no idea how inefficient our health care is because of the massive government regulatory structures in place that demand inefficiency. A self fulfilling spiral of financial doom that feeds on itself and guarantees millions of Americans jobs for no other purpose than to support the bloated structure known as American health care.
The public's perception and the reality of the situation are in need of a major educational initiative.
Thursday, June 25, 2009
What Killed Michael Jackson?
________________________________ 10 OutburstsThe news says it was a heart attack. I'm not so sure. There are so many variables here, it's hard to know where to begin. First of all, in medical jargon, physicians often think of a heart attack as a myocardial infarction, a condition where a sudden occlusion of a major arterial vessel to the heart results in a loss of oxygen to valuable heart muscle. There is a whole spectrum of ischemic disease. It can start with stable angina, a relatively benign condition that can be managed for years with appropriate medications and elective procedures. More concerning is unstable angina, or chest pain or its anginal equivalent that generally occurs at rest. Most physicians would consider unstable angina a reason for admission and close hospital monitoring.
- diabetes
- hypertension
- hyperlipidemia
- smoking
- central obesity/inactivity
- family history
- history of vascular disease in other sources
- systemic inflammatory disease such as autoimmune conditions (lupus, rheumatoid arthritis)
- illicit drugs (meth, cocaine)
- coagulopathy (perhaps antiphospholipid antibody syndrome)
- radiation exposure
- untreated hyper or hypothyroidism
- prinzmetal's angina
I've Never Seen A Tomato Tree This Big
________________________________ 3 OutburstsThe Truth About Canadian Medicine
________________________________ 11 OutburstsYou may think all is well in Canada. A land where FREE=MORE has been granted a birth right. It has been said many times before: You have three endpoints for which to strive for. Cheap, Quality or Quick. Pick any two. You can not have all three. It seems that Canada has decided to sacrifice Quick. You can always guarantee cheap health care. You simply stop paying for it. That's called rationing. Getting in line and waiting is a classic form of rationing used by governments all across this land of ours.
In fact, as a resident in training at a VA facility, I saw first hand how rationing of care occurred using waiting as the tool of choice. Schedules blocked at 5-8 patients. Leaving when the clock struck 4. Scheduling dead patients. Yes folks, that actually happened. As an inpatient, technologists would finish their day on their terms. Getting studies after hours was impossible. Patients would wait for days to get an echo or a doppler. I once had an xray technologist refuse to come in, from home, in the middle of the night to take a chest xray on a crashing ventilator patient. The fact that the VA would not staff an overnight xray technologist was simply ridiculous. Try to get anything done on a holiday. Not only impossible but the hoops one had to travel through to attempt it would make Obama cry if he had any idea what the government run care was doing to his Vets.
Wait times is rationing, no matter how you look at it. You can find the link to the Fraser Institute on Canada's Wait times here at Dr Hal Dall's blog. I want to thank him for pointing it out. It is a fascinating look into the discrepancies in Canada's health care, in spite of the equality for all mantra of social solidarity. Here is an excerpt from the research.
Finally, the promise of the Canadian health care system is not being realized. On the contrary, a profusion of research reveals that cardiovascular surgery queues are routinely jumped by the famous and politically-connected, that suburban and rural residents confront barriers to access not encountered by their urban counterparts, and that low-income Canadians have less access to specialists, particularly cardiovascular ones, are less likely to utilize diagnostic imaging, and have lower cardiovascular and cancer survival rates than their higher-income neighbours. This grim portrait is the legacy of a medical system offering low expectations cloaked in lofty rhetoric. Indeed, under the current regime—first-dollar coverage with use limited by waiting, and crucial medical resources priced and allocated by governments— prospects for improvement are dim. Only substantial reform of that regime is likely to alleviate the medical system’s most curable disease—waiting times that are consistently and significantly longer than physicians feel is clinically reasonable.
Only In America Would A Patient Request A Bone Marrow Biopsy
________________________________ 2 OutburstsI recently wrote how it's OK to do nothing when asked to evaluate a patient as a subspecialist. An oncologist responded with this unbelievable comment.
I am an oncologist. Recently, I had a patient sent to me for a mild lab abnormality. Two years ago, she had been seen by another oncologist, and told that it was a benign process. Now, with two additional years worth of labs showing absolutely no change, I concurred with the initial evaluation and told her no additional testing was needed. The patient told me "my PCP told me that he will feel better, I will feel better, and you will feel better if you do a bone marrow biopsy to make certain." I don't feel better doing better marrow biopsies....especially when they are for very weak indications. It is that unveiled threat of failure to diagnosis that drives so much inappropriate testing. I discussed the case with the PCP. We agreed that a bone marrow biopsy was not indicated (and he had never made the above statement to the patient). Unfortunately, in our now-is-when-I-want-it-done society, watchful waiting doesn't go over well (plus or minus that "irrational fear" of legal liability).
I can't think of any rational reason why a patient would want to subject themselves to a bone marrow biopsy after two oncologists suggested, in their expert medical opinion, that one was unnecessary. This procedure is not without pain. In fact, it can carry a significant amount of discomfort. It is not cheap. It carries with it highly specialized pathological processing and interpretation. Why would a patient subject themselves to such an ordeal? May I suggest that they wouldn't, if they had to pay for it, even a portion of it. FREE=MORE
I might add that from a legal standpoint, physicians establish the standard of care. If everyone with a mild abnormality gets a bone marrow biopsy because physicians say they should then not doing one would establish a practice outside the standard of care. However, I have a problem with using standard of care as the basis for making determinations of negligence.
Just because it is common practice to do bone marrow biopsies on everyone with an abnormal lab, does not make it appropriate care. Take for example McAllen, Texas, a place that appears to have a culture of excess when it comes to testing and intervention. Is that standard the right standard? Would not doing a bone marrow on everyone with a lab abnormality open one up to negligence because everyone else is doing them? It does, but it shouldn't.
If the standard of care in a community is just wrong, how can one defend oneself against allegations of negligence when they went against the grain of what other physicians in the community would do?
I don't have a good answer for that. Guidelines have been heavily infiltrated by specialty societies. Many aspects of guidelines carry suspect recommendations based on suspect financial motivations. So much of medicine is based on medical judgment. There simply aren't guidelines. Many guidelines are based on a nice pretty package of healthy white men between the ages of 19 and 65. Many guidelines cannot be extrapolated across diverse populations. Many guidelines differ widely between different specialty societies and other nonprofit organizations.
So where does that leave the physician? They are stuck. Damned if you do and damned if you don't. If every doc in town is doing bone marrows on patients with slight abnormalities, you can be assured a lawyer will come knocking on your door if you don't do one on a patient you don't think needs one AND a delayed diagnosis is ultimately made.
By falling into that trap, you doctor are establishing an irrational standard that can never be achieved. A standard that is bankrupting our country out of a fear of preventing a bad outcome. When in fact, by doing more, we are actually causing more harm than good. Every study you find shows poorer outcomes in areas with a higher percentage of subspecialists and lower percentage of primary medical doctors.
It's time physicians take back their profession and establish standards based on sound scientific principles, personalized for every patient based on their extensive medical training, and stop making medical decisions based on a fear of deviating from irrational standards of care which they themselves create. The only folks getting rich off the brilliant legal scam known as standard of care are the lawyers filing claims and the unscrupulous doctors doing highly lucrative procedures (as determined by RVU/RUC) under the guise of standard of care. While patients are getting harmed and the Medicare National Bank is going bankrupt.
Would You Work a Month For Free?
________________________________ 1 OutburstsBritish Airlines asked it's employees to do just that.
In an e-mail to all its staff, the airline offered workers between one and four weeks of unpaid leave -- but with the option to work during this period. British Airways employs just more than 40,000 people in the United Kingdom.
Why Can You Stick A Cotton Swab In Your Nose But Shouldn't Stick It In Your Ear?
________________________________ 10 OutburstsAnother pressing question for the day:
My question is a two-part question.
Part A: Why is it wrong to stick a cotton swab in your ear but perfectly OK to stick one up your nose?Part B: Do doctors ever use cotton swabs to clean their own ears? If not, how do you get the water and stuff out of your ears after a shower?
Should You Change Your Own Blood Pressure Medicine Dosing?
________________________________ 12 OutburstsA reader wants to know
I am on blood pressure medicine for HBP. In the last few days my blood pressure has been pretty low. I probably could fix this by reducing or eliminating the medication. I don't want to bother my doctor, but I'm reluctant to substitute my judgment for his on this matter. The problem is, I don't know what all he has in mind in prescribing the medication. If I call his nurse for advice she will want me to come in.
He's already reduced the medication once before. At that time he did not give me instructions to reduce it on my own, so I'm thinking he might expect me to call him. The last time I had this problem, the nurse suggested he was going to change medications, but he didn't, he reduced the dose instead.
Is this something I should just be managing myself, or does my doctor need to make the decision every time? I don't mind going in, but I don't want to bother him, either, with trivial problems.
I think I may have answered my own question. If the nurse can't anticipate what he's going to do, how can I be expected to know what to do?
I would still appreciate any insight you have into how doctors think, especially on blood pressure maintenance.
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Doing Nothing Is Still An Option
________________________________ 2 OutburstsOver at KevinMd a post suggested that outpatient primary medical doctors should have their fees raised by reducing the fees of subspecialist. Under current RVU/RUC rules the physician payment system is a WIN/LOSE system. For every winner there is a loser.
A responder to Dr Kevin's post, a specialist, left this comment:
There also seems to be a feeling that all of these procedures we do are unnecessary and unindicated. As a specialist, the vast majority of patients I see are referred to me by primary care physicians because they feel their patients need additional care. Why would they send me patients if they felt that further treatment was not indicated?
Years ago, I had a patient I was consulted on for a deep venous thrombosis from a subspecialist. For whatever reason, the hematology service was consulted as well. I ran into the hematologist reviewing the chart. I explained that patient probably got their VTE from a surgery they had several weeks prior. I asked them if they were going to order the horridly expensive profile of coagulopathy tests. And you know what they said to me?
"I usually would not, but since I was consulted I probably would".
After discussing the case we decided not to order all the tests that cost thousands of dollars to run. I bring this up in relation to the above comment because of the above specialist's comment.
Just because you consult as a specialist, doesn't mean you HAVE to do something. As a hospitalist, a lot of what I do is watchful waiting. I don't do anything and the patient gets better. Just because a primary MD sends a patient to you as an orthopaedist doesn't mean you have to do anything. If the question is what to do, doing nothing is certainly an option.
I think this is an important difference between primary trained MDs and subspecialty trained MDs. Being a subspecialist does not relinquish your right for watchful waiting. But I find many times that concept is alien. Perhaps it's the thought that not doing anything will not please the primary. Perhaps not doing anything means a loss of procedural revenue. Perhaps not doing anything leaves open an irrational fear of legal liability.
Whatever the reason, I take offense to the subspecialist who suggests that primary MDs refer patients because something has to be done. Sometimes, it just doesn't. Really. Doing nothing is still an option
How Many Blogs A Day Do You Follow?
________________________________ 6 OutburstsWith vacation, summer weather, busy work, and Mrs Happy's unexplained desire to spend time with me I haven't been able to follow my favorites for almost a month. At some point I will tune in. With that said, I have 350 blogs in my cue. There is so much great stuff out there.
How many blogs do you follow?
Hats Off To Happy's Hospital Transcription Department
________________________________ 1 OutburstsAs many critics of hospitalist medicine know, for every hand off a voltage drop of information can occur. I personally make every effort I can to thoroughly review the chart when I come on to a new service for the week. I also try and leave detailed explanations about the status of my evaluations when I go off service.
But what about the discharge? Since Hospitalists generally don't follow their patients once they leave the hospital, there is a high probability of bad things happening between the time of discharge and the first appointment with the patient's outpatient internist or family medicine doctor. This no man's land can possibly lead to readmissions as neither patient nor hospitalist nor primary MD have any idea what's going on.
One way to reduce this voltage drop of information is to have systems in place that make sure the patient's primary MD gets the hospital discharge summary in a timely manner. So how do I define timely? My definition is 24 hours. I learned yesterday that 81.9% of hospitalist discharge summaries are transcribed in 0-12 hours. 14.8% are transcribed in 12-24 hours. That means almost 97% of all Happy's hospitalist discharge summaries are automatically sent to the patients primary MD (and any other subspecialist noted) in 24 hours or less.
Since we have a policy in our group of doing discharge summaries immediately upon discharge, patient information is received by the primary MD in almost all patients within 24 hours. I can't say the same for many subspecialty services where we are asked to readmit several weeks after their primary discharge, in which there is no discharge summary to be found.
Because I find many subspecialty groups do not dictate discharge summaries in a timely manner, I will dictate a letter to the primary MD on many patients I am consulted on. Why? Because I know that no discharge summary will be performed for a month or more. And I feel bad for the primary MD and patient for bouncing from doctor to doctor with no easily accessible written record (and especially no verbal communication either).
We live in a fragmented system of health care bouncing between hospitals and clinics with no easy way to hunt down information. I dictate these letters (which by the way are completely voluntary and uncompensated by anyone) out of a personally duty to limit the loss of information as patients bounce around in no man's land.
Happy's hospital group has also surveyed our referring primary MDs to learn how they like to be notified (phone call or not) upon discharge. We will call if they want. We won't if they don't. But they will always (97% of the time) get our discharge summary in 24 hours or less.
That's how you provide great quality care. And I can assure you, as bundled payments come our way, hospitals will intensify efforts to improve their in house processes to limit readmissions. Decreasing volatge drop is one such effort that will be taken. They will do this because they have to. Just like every hospital in this country hired chart police to scour physician documentation to maximize payment as determined by the Medicare National Bank.
So congrats Happy's Hospital transcription service on a job well done. You are an example of how things should be done.
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Obama Is Still Smoking And the Hypocrisy Continues
________________________________ 18 OutburstsUnfreaking believable. The ultimate act of hypocrisy continues. You can't talk about health care while blowing smoke rings. You might as well be blowing smoke out of your ass. You have no credibility as a health care advocate when you mock healthy lifestyles.
Obama noted he is not a daily smoker and "doesn't do it in front of" his children
Major Announcement From Pfizer
________________________________ 1 OutburstsPfizer Corp. announced today that Viagra will soon be available in liquid form, and will be marketed by Pepsi Cola as a power beverage suitable for use as a mixer. It will now be possible for a man to literally pour himself a stiff one. Obviously we can no longer call this a soft drink, and it gives new meaning to the names of 'cocktails', 'highballs' and just a good old-fashioned 'stiff drink'. Pepsi will market the new concoction by the name of: MOUNT & DO. Thought for the day: There is more money being spent on breast implants and Viagra today than on Alzheimer's research. This means that by 2040, there should be a large elderly population with perky boobs and huge erections and absolutely no recollection of what to do with them. Thanks to my grandma Fern for alerting me to this breaking news.
How Much Does A Hip Replacement Cost For A Dog?
________________________________ 5 OutburstsYou would be surprised. Dr Khuly at the blog Dolittler explains.
Hip replacements (in which the entire joint is replaced with artificial components made specifically for pets) go from $3,500 a hip (the very lowest I’ve ever heard) to about twice that. And because so many sufferers are bilaterally affected, a two-sided hip replacements is usually better than its unilateral version. Yes, that’s $7,000 to about $14,000.Compared to the human version, however, this highly specialized procedure (almost always performed by a team of board-certified veterinary surgeons who are additionally schooled and certified in this approach) goes for less than a tenth of its human equivalent (and they are equivalent in most every way).
Why Did My Tomato Plant Die?
________________________________ 2 OutburstsI Guess I Was Meme'd
________________________________ 9 OutburstsLooks like da Boss over at DB's Medical Rants Meme'd me last week. I guess I didn't get the memo on vacation. So here it is boss.
4 Movies you would watch over and over
- Caddyshack
- Vacation
- Spies Like Us
- Titanic
- Cairo, Egypt
- Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Gainesville, Florida
- Rikers Island
- Lost
- Desperate Housewives
- The Super Nanny (kick some ass nanny!)
- A Baby Story
- Hawaii (x3)
- Cancun
- Yellowstone (last week)
- North Dakota
- Mrs Happy'sTaco night
- Mrs Happy's Chicken Enchilada
- Mrs Happy's anything
- Sandwiches
4 Places you would rather be right now
- Running with Mrs Happy
- Playing with my pup pups
- Working
- Planting tomatoes
hmmmm....
I don't like tagging people so I won't. But anyone feel free to respond.
An Internist Offers Far More Than Primary Care
________________________________ 16 OutburstsA reader over at A Nurse Practitioner's View responded to a post by author Stephan Ferrara, NP. A post which does not represent my views at all. In response to Stephan, a reader leaves the following comment.
I would have to respectfully disagree with most of these assertions.
- Being a nurse for 50 years will not prepare you to practice a full scope of medical practice. The nursing career and responsibilities are simply not the same. I could be a doctor for 50 years and have no ability to practice nursing independently, even though I am around nurses in their capacity all day long. The two career pathways are not interchangeable. Nursing education and nursing experience does not prepare one to meet the requirements to practice independently in the same scope as an MD. If that was the case, we should all abandon medical school in favor of nursing school and nursing experience.
- NP programs have rigorous standards. That's great to know. Now I ask you to put those standards up against any medical school and you will find that the two simply don't compare. It's not even close. In fact, if you knew how less rigorous your training was compared to any MD degree, you would be frightened at how under educated you would be to provide a full scope of care equivalent to your MD trained counterparts. Perhaps you feel MD training over qualifies one for the role you see yourself providing in the primary care world, independently. I might suggest you have a vastly inferior scope of practice in mind, or perhaps you don't understand what it means to practice independently. I can assure you with 100% certainty, that your rigorous training would not provide you with the skills to practice independently in the same scope as MD trained physicians. I'm sorry to break the news to you.
- I'm sorry to burst your bubble once again, but in the real world primary care setting, you are not on even playing fields. The reason you feel this way is because you simply don't understand what being a primary care physician means. And you believe, foolishly, that your NP training provides with the skills to practice independently on par with the MD trained. I'm here to tell you, categorically, you may be able to practice primary care, as defined by you, but you cannot practice in the the same depth of scope as an MD trained internist. As an internist, I am trained to take care of many organ specific conditions independently. I do not call myself a cardiologist or a pulmonologist or a nephrologist because I am not trained to practice a full scope of those specialties independently. As such, you can provide primary care as defined by you, but your ability to provide an equal scope of services is limited as well. Your view of primary care is simply myopic. You will only understand what you experience. And your experience as an NP will be vastly inferior than an MD trained internist. That's not insulting. It's reality. You just aren't trained to do what I do.
- Sometimes the best education is on the job. I am going to have to disagree with on that as well. I certainly would not want you practicing on me as a full scope independent practicing NP when I come to you expecting you to be an expert in your field. As a resident, I had multiple levels of supervision. There were always experts looking over my shoulder, correcting my mistakes and guiding me towards the right answers. I would never subject myself to caring for someone while learning "on the job." If you want to learn on the job, you should go to medical school and get a residency and have a team of experts watch your back.
- Substituting a NP for an internist because there are too few internists is like substituting an eagle scout for a para military special forces agent because all the agents have quit or retired. NP and MD training are not interchangeable. An eagle scout can do a lot, but most can't kill with their bare hands. In the same regards, NPs may be able to do a lot of what MDs do (including specialists), but they also can't do a lot of what most MDs do. I don't understand where in the course of training, folks decided that NPs could practice independently in primary care but not subspecialty care. There is nothing special about being a subspecialist, except the extra several years of training. I would suggest that NPs take a 500 hour clinical experience, do ten heart caths, ten TEEs and become certified as independently praciticing cardiology NPs. The suggestion that these NP cardiologists were "on even playing field" with their MD cardiologists would be laughed out of town by just about every health care entity in this country. I view with hilarity the same assertion that NPs and internists are on even playing fields. The several years that differentiates my practice of cardiology from a cardiologists practice of cardiology is the how I think about NP vs internist training. In fact the difference is much greater do to the lack of medical school level education. I would never claim to be a fully independent practicing cardiologist because I am not qualified to do so. As such, the insinuation that an NP can practice outpatient internal medicine independently is absurd. And any NP who believes they are "on even playing fields" is ignorant of their own ignorance. You are the type of practicing provider I fear the most. Just as I would fear myself if I claimed to be an independently practicing cardiologist. This is reality. Your scope is simply not anywhere near the depth of scope a physician is capable of. You can define your scope as you wish. But understand, your lack of training does not provide you with the same capabilities as an internist. But your claims of being "on equal playing fields" is intellectually dishonest. You have medical skills. You also have nursing skills. You don't have internal medicine skills. Sorry to be the one to tell you. And internal medicine skills are required to practice a full range of outpatient primary care.
- I have no illusions about the "status" of MDs as you call them. I find myself no more special than the cable guy. I am trained to do what I do because I invested the time and energy, determination, hard work, sacrifice and delayed gratification to excel in the practice of internal medicine.. I would expect nothing less from my physician caring for me in my time of need. You believe I think physicians are better. I don't. I think they are much better trained. As they are. By exponential amounts on the basis of their education and experience as medical students, residents and practicing doctors. That doesn't make me better than you. It makes me more educated than you. And that makes my scope vastly superior to practice internal medicine than those who haven't experience the rigorous training. I respect everyone for their contributions to this world we live in. But to believe you are on an "even playing field" is a clear indication of your lack of insight into what primary care is and what you believe it should be. I ask you go read Dr Centor's blog as indicated below.
Yet, we know that high quality primary care does save money. I believe Verghese is making the classic mistake of defining prevention only as primary prevention. Those who study epidemiology and health services research understand that the real value occurs in secondary and tertiary prevention.
Time for some prevention definitions:
- Primary prevention avoids the development of a disease. Most population-based health promotion activities are primary preventive measures.
- Secondary prevention activities are aimed at early disease detection, thereby increasing opportunities for interventions to prevent progression of the disease and emergence of symptoms.
- Tertiary prevention reduces the negative impact of an already established disease by restoring function and reducing disease-related complications
As most medical students, residents and fellows can attest too, the vast majority of our training is spent managing complications of disease, not the disease itself. It is impossible to appreciate how to manage a disease, without seeing the thousands of permutations of complications that present themselves. It is difficult, to nearly impossible, to be an excellent provider of medical care if you don't know how to manage the complications. It is difficult to understand how to proceed with secondary and tertiary management of disease without first becoming an expert on the complications of those disease.
This is where the magic of residency and fellowship happens. As physicians, we are experts in complication management. Primary care is not primary prevention. Primary care is primary + secondary+tertiary prevention. And it is complication managment when those efforts fail. It is with MD level training that one begins to appreciate the subtle nuances required to understand the physiology and pathophysiology in patients with chronic medical disease. How multiple medications interact. Their side effect profiles. Their complications and exacerbations. This is not primary prevention. This is primary care. This is internal medicine. It is a rigorous process where we learn to differentiate patients from guidelines and make medical judgements on an individualized basis. You can't learn a full scope of this in NP school. You can't learn this after 50 years of nursing. You learn it by studying the full skill set necessary to achieve that end.
So Jane and Stephan, I respect you. I respect you for your skills. I respect you for your education and desire to advance your patient management skills. You have me all wrong if you believe I believe you have no value in patient care. You do. And you have an important role in patient care. But you can't do what I do, no matter how many years of on the job training you experience. I will not back down on my assertion that independently practicing NPs should be held to the same standards as all other independently practicing MDs. You may practice primary care, but you don't practice family medicine. And you don't practice internal medicine. You practice primary care, some vague unknown entity that you have defined by your own skill set.
Perhaps the fact that most of the public has no idea how to differentiate internists from family medicine MDs from NPs works in your favor. Perhaps you have gained legislative equality in many districts at the expense of educational equality. That's something that will eventually play itself out. I do know, based on my own training and experiences that should I ever find myself in a condition that requires the skills of an internist, an internist is where I am going. An internist who has far more to offer than primary care.
Monday, June 22, 2009
Did Your Pet Give You The MRSA?
________________________________ 4 Outbursts
The Lancet is reporting fido may be your vector for MRSA. One more reason to sterilize your pets.
What Does The Drug Company Agreement Really Mean?
________________________________ 2 OutburstsThe drug makers have agreed to cover part of the costs of brand name drugs in the donut hole, that no man's land of Medicare Part D where patients must pay for their own drugs.
As reported:
Obama said that drug companies have pledged to spend $80 billion over the next decade to help reduce the cost of drugs for seniors and pay for a portion of Obama's health care legislation. The agreement with the pharmaceutical industry would help close a gap in prescription drug coverage under Medicare.I see one problem with the assertion that drug companies will be "spending" $80 billion dollars to reduce the cost of drugs for seniors. Drug companies and by default, their board of directors have allegiance to their shareholders, not the the US government or the seniors of this country. I can assure you, this deal may look good on paper (for seniors) and it may benefit seniors a great deal (FREE=MORE) but it is also one step further to the promised land of the senior vote. And it will worsen access to drugs for everyone else. There is no free lunch in this world.
It may save seniors money, but it will not be revenue neutral. It will not save $80 billion dollars over 10 years or reduce overall costs of care. Somehow, someway, the costs will be shifted. It may mean higher drug costs for those privately insured or the uninsured. It may mean decreased access to compassion programs. It may mean higher costs to hospitals. Whatever the agreement means, it will not mean $80 billion dollars saved in the next decade.
Drug companies are not in the business of sacrificing their shareholders or bond holders for patriotic means. They are in the business of making money. And that means they have selfish interests to maximize their ROI for any agreement they make with the government.
The question isn't really how wonderful this is for seniors. The question is how will buying off seniors affect the rest of America. And I'm telling you here, right now, you will see higher costs for everyone not lucky enough to bath in a sea of FREE=MORE known as the Medicare National Bank.
Sunday, June 21, 2009
An Incredible Error of Arrogance In the AMA
________________________________ 7 OutburstsThis is a personal observation but one that I find incredibly elite and destructive to the free speech process of political discussion. Over at KevinMD a series of original guest columns have made their way onto his excellent blog. Here is the latest. I have noticed, except for the first guest column, all subsequent columns have had their comments closed. I know that this is not the personal policy of Dr Kevin. He is always open to polite disagreement and praise. At my blog I censor no one unless it is threatening or illegal.
President Obama recognized in his speech that medical liability reforms are needed to reduce rising health-care costs.
You Are Living In The Medicare Tomato
________________________________ 7 OutburstsSaturday, June 20, 2009
With Extra Cheese?
________________________________ 12 Outbursts
Cheesewheels: "A cheeseburger patty, battered; then deep fried. Served in Lander, Wyoming at the Dairy Land Drive In.
Friday, June 12, 2009
Is This The Future Of Hospitalist Medicine?
________________________________ 19 OutburstsThe Refugee posts his concerns over at Hospitalist With A View. It's an excellent read on how the economics of medicine drive the medicine itself. You get what you pay for. If you value pay well for high cost procedural/surgical medicine, you will get systems in place to deliver high cost procedural/surgical medicine with excellent efficiency. If you paid cognitive medicine well, you would get systems in place to deliver highly efficient cognitive medicine with excellent efficiency. Here's a clip below. Go read the rest.
But that wasn't enough. Now the proceduralist/technicians want to maximize the number of procedures (which are supposed to include a global 90-day period of post-op care) without having to deal with all that pesky time-consuming post-op management. Hospitals that make money off the backs of these guys salivate at the notion of boosting their procedure output. What's the new en vogue way to achieve this? By turning over all of that post-op care to the hospitalist. We are being shamelessly used to construct the assembly line that plucks the money off the Medicare (and occasionally privately-insured) tree.
Does Obama Have Bitemporal Wasting?
________________________________ 1 OutburstsHave Hospitalists Become The Dumping Ground?
________________________________ 10 OutburstsA reader asks the question:
Has hospitalist co-management simply turned into outright, legitimized dumping?
I get called from the ER to admit a perforated viscous in a 80 year old woman with abdominal pain, and copious free air on CT. General surgery was called, told the ER "admit to the hospitalist" and refused to even call our service to discuss it as he/she "not seen the patient yet" and told the ER when pressed when he/she would be in, it would be "some time tonight" rather than the 1 hour required by our medical staff bylaws.
Thursday, June 11, 2009
I Got My Ass Handed To Me
________________________________ 50 Outbursts13 admissions, one consult and one central line in a 12 hour shift.
7 : 99223 high level complexity admissions
4 : 99220 high level observation admissions
2 : 99291 critical care admissions
1 : 99233 ortho follow up consult
1 : 36556 central line
with 1/2 hour left to write this post.
If every one of those patients were Medicare, how much did I bill for the night? Let's see
7 (99223) About 5 Total RVUs worth about $170 each for a total of 35 RVUs/$1190
4 (99220) About 4 Total RVUs worth about $140 each for a total of 16 RVUs/$560
2 (99291) About 6 Total RVUs worth about $200 each for a total of 12 RVUs/$400
1 (99233) About 2.5 Total RVUs worth about $90
1 (36556) About 3.5 Total RVUs worth about $110
Remember, it's all relative. Tonight, a record night, I produced a total RVU (work RVU+practice expense+malpractice) of about 69 RVUs. If every one of those encounters was a Medicare patient, I would have collected close to $2,400.
If you look at just the work RVU's, that RVU amount that is attributed only to physician expertise, education and effort (strip out the practice expense and malpractice expense from the total RVUs) , the workRVUs amounts to about 52 RVUs for 14 complicated admissions/critical care/consults/ and a central line.
Lets compare this to the Medicare payment to the orthopaedic surgeon for doing the total knee arthroplasty (CPT 27447) that I was consulted on. It is worth about 23 work RVUs. Add in the 4 work RVUs for the consult before surgery and you're looking at 27 work RVUs to do a total knee arthroplasty. Now granted, this surgery carries with it a global 90 day period for which the surgeon is required to care for the patient as part of their agreement.
To produce 52 work RVUs an orthopaedic surgeon would have to perform just under two total knee arthroplasties (about 1.9). So lets assume they do that in the 11 hours. Let's say the consult takes 1/2 an hour ( that's pushing it). Two consults would take an hour. That leaves 10 hours of time for 1.9 surgeries and all post operative follow up.
It would take an orthopaedic surgeon a time commitment of 5 hours over a 90 day period for their total knee to produce the volume equivalent to the time and effort put in by a hospitalist on a record busy day.
Let's even assume that it takes 5 hours of OR/post OR cares to do a total knee (which is perhaps double or triple the actual time committment), if you are a medical student would you rather spend 11 hours admitting 14 people or would you rather spend 11 hours doing surgery on two of them.
The answer is simple. And that's why medical students know exactly what they are doing when they shun cognitive only medicine in favor of the lucrative procedural/surgical based subspecialties. When you can earn the same amount seeing two patients with a five hour commitment that in actuality may take less than 1/2 that much, deciding what medical career to pursue is not rocket science. And it's all courtesy of the RUC.
Before some subspecialists spam me as saying I knew what I was getting into, let me say I love my job. Hospitalist medicine has left the irrational constraints the RVU pot. This discussion is not personally about me, but rather about the reality of the model for which we choose to pay doctors to perform.
America, the RVU scam is directly responsible for the exacerbating debacle in McAllen, Texas, a pattern of deceit that is also present in every corner of this country . You should be very afraid of your health care. The RUC and its RVU scam has turned you into bars of gold.
Bars of gold that the medical students of today have gone searching for, by their shunning of the cognitive based specialty of internal medicine.
Wednesday, June 10, 2009
The Fed Would Be Shut Down If It Was Audited
________________________________ 1 Outbursts"If the Fed examiners were set upon the Fed's own documents-unlabeled documents-to pass judgment on the Fed's capacity to survive the difficulties it faces in credit, it would shut this institution down," he said. "The Fed is undercapitalized in a way that Citicorp is undercapitalized."
How hypocritical for our government to forcibly seize private assets and demand a gutting of the executives in charge, while practicing unsustainable irresponsible policy at the same time. Hypocrites. All of them.
Kudos To Mrs Happy
________________________________ 7 OutburstsFor running four miles for the first time in her life. And she came in at just over a nine minute mile. Next goal? Perhaps a 10K by fall. Keep it up. It wasn't long ago you were saying how you couldn't even go a mile. The body has an amazing way of adapting to exercise. Every day it gets easier and easier. Before you know it, you're running marathons.
Tuesday, June 9, 2009
The Consult That Wasn't, But Was
________________________________ 4 OutburstsEvery year that passes in this hospitalist medicine journey of mine, I learn to appreciate how dangerous being sick and hospitalized can be to your health. Not a day goes by where I have to explain to a patient or their loved one that another day in the hospital is not necessary and may be harmful to their health. Many folks don't realize that the hospital is a dangerous place to live. A hospital is not a hotel. A hospital is not a safe house to drop granny off so she doesn't interfere with the weekend fishing trip planned months ago.
- Request. There must be a request for the consult
- Rendering an Opinion. The consultant must render an opinion to a question.
- Reply. The consultant must document their reply. This is usually a consult note in the medical record.
Monday, June 8, 2009
What Do You Do When The Hospitalist Can't Get Along With The Outpatient Doc?
________________________________ 2 OutburstsA Reader asks the question:
Do you have any advice for an outpatient colleague who is struggling with his hospitalist peers over how to draw boundaries between their (autonomous) management and the outpatient doctor's genuine desire to contribute towards the quality of care, especially regarding the discharge planning process? They're both frustrated with one another. Hospitalists feel outpatient doc is co-managing while outpatient doctor feels hospitalist won't listen to years of experience with the patient. How to broker a successful outcome?There are several boundaries that need to be established here. If an outpatient doctor is going to turn over their hospital care to the inpatient doctor, they need to have an element of trust in the abilities of the inpatient doctors to provide appropriate care. Happy's hospital group does not do partial admissions of convenience. In other words, we do not admit over night and turn over care in the morning, because the outpatient doc needed their beauty sleep. If we admit a patient we take care of them until the end. That's not to say, sometimes, on rare occasion the outpatient doc will take over care after a 3 am admission. These are handled on a case by case basis.
I know that many outpatient docs do social rounds. They will swing by and talk with their patient. Sometimes they will leave a social note, sometimes not. But they never interfere with our management of the patient. They don't write orders . And they don't bill. (Now that's a dedicated doc!)
As for the discharge process, we always call the primary doc on discharge. We always dictate our discharge summaries immediately. We have processes in place that guarantee our DC summary gets to the outpatient doc within 24 hours. When I talk with the outpatient docs I always let them know briefly what happened, and what needs followed up with. I find often times, many docs don't care. They don't want to be bothered. They are busy trying to survive in their clinics. Some love the updates. Some hate them.
Everyone is different. We have tried to find out who likes what so we can notify those that like to be notified and leave those that don't alone.
I try and bow to the will of the outpatient doc if they have changes in the recommended discharge planning. They are the ones who will care for the patient on follow up. If they have a suggestion, I usually follow it. In the end you do what's right for the patient. If you guys can't come to a common ground (communication) with your referring outpatient docs, sometimes it's better that they see their own patients until an agreement is reached and boundaries can be established.
It's Time To Gut The Education Process
________________________________ 8 OutburstsThe RVU payment hierarchy is clear. There is a discrepancy between the payment for cognitive vs procedural and surgical services. Many subspecialists like to use the argument that their training is longer and therefor their payment should be higher.
And they are correct. They should get paid more for the longer training they experience. That's why I am proposing a change in their training that better reflects real world experience of what they have to offer me as a hospitalist (substitute internists or family medicine doc for hospitalist) or their patients.
I have yet to find a subspecialist that offers any great insight in the evaluation, diagnosis or treatment of medical conditions that exit their specialized organ of study. All medical subspecialists have always been internal medicine trained first. Whether the chosen field of expertise is cardiology, gastroenterology, allergy, infectious disease or nephrology, all of them have first completed residency in internal medicine.
The further pursuit of specialization can take anywhere from two to four additional years of training in a fellowship designed to make specialists experts in their organ of choice.
It is this specialization that has made internists turned subspecialists into subspecialists who have lost their ability to be internists. Is it possible that some medical based subspecialists can practice internal medicine? Yes, but I would guess the vast majority cannot nor would they have any desire to. They cannot because they are too far removed from the daily practice of subspecialty things to do what internists do. They don't want to because internal medicine is very complicated and involves little economic reward.
So I am here to suggest that we stop farting around by wasting everyone's time and money. Stop waisting billions of dollars of tax payer money every year. Stop wasting years of young doctors' time. I think it's time that subspecialists stop becoming internists first and go directly to their subspecialty training track, right out of medical school.
Instead of taking six years to become a gastroenterologist, (three years of internal medicine and three years of gastro) it would take just three. Cardiology? Three years. Why? Because we are all fooling ourselves if we believe that three extra years of internal medicine training adds any benefit for the vast majority of clinical patients who need specialized care. If you need a doctor to put it all together, you go to an internist. They are the ones that connect the dots. If you need a question answered about the heart, you ask for the opinion of a cardiologist. But the three years it takes for a cardiologist to learn how to manage diverticulitis is three years of wasted time and money that we just can't afford anymore.
One of my biggest pet peeves as a hospitalist is when I come to the chart the next day and find that one medical subspecialist has written a consult for another medical subspecialist. That fact that subspecialists believe only other subspecialists are capable of handling organ specific disease says to me that their understanding of the specialty of generalist medicine is gone. They have lost touch with reality. They can't understand how an internist would be capable of handling things they can't.
The same goes with the surgical subspecialties. There is no reason to train an orthopod to take out a gallbladder. If you're going to be an orthopod specializing in the hand, your entire existence should be learning about the hand. You are worthless to the general public, spending tax payer money in residency learning to replace hips if all you're going to do is carpal tunnel surgery.
I would like to believe that having a broad base of education for all physicians is helpful for patient care. But my experience with subspecialists says to me it just doesn't matter. Let's stop beating around the bush. All that extra education of generalist training that subspecialty medical and surgical subspecialists experience is a waste of everyone's time and money. Let's train them quicker. Get them out quicker. That way their argument for higher pay because of longer education disappears. Since they offer little in the way of anything outside their three year subspecialty training, we can pay them with reasonable parity.
And they can stop complaining that they deserve such a high premium for all their extended education. An education which comes at a great expense in direct tax payer training dollars and the preceived entitlement of higher reimbursement in clinical practice. A generalist education who's benefit disappears almost immediately once the cocoon of academia disappears and the first paycheck arrives from the practice of community based private practice.
Clinical Pearl: Stroke
________________________________ 1 OutburstsCerebrovascular Accidents (CVA) are not accidents. They are strokes. It's time we referred to them as such.
Saturday, June 6, 2009
A Fascinating Piece Of Journalism From Dr Atul Gawande: The City That Couldn't Stop Treating
________________________________ 12 Outbursts
Dramatic improvements and savings will take at least a decade. But a choice must be made. Whom do we want in charge of managing the full complexity of medical care? We can turn to insurers (whether public or private), which have proved repeatedly that they can’t do it. Or we can turn to the local medical communities, which have proved that they can. But we have to choose someone—because, in much of the country. And the result is the most wasteful and the least sustainable health-care system in the world.
Friday, June 5, 2009
The Pickled Liver
________________________________ 0 Outbursts- Chronic liver failure due to alcohol abuse: Sad
- Yelling & cursing all night: Frustrating
- Greeting your day shift nurse by stumbling naked down the hall: Priceless
Friday Afternoon Humor
________________________________ 0 OutburstsHeard in the halls
Patient: I take my medications religiously.
Doctor: Does that mean you only take them on Sundays?
The RVU Payment Hierarchy
________________________________ 2 OutburstsMuch has been written about the RVU payment scheme generated by the AMA and propagated down the economic food chain beginning the the grand daddy of destruction itself, the Medicare National Bank. Relative Value Units, as they are called, have been used to determine an economic value for every possible CPT intervention a physician can bill for. The basic pattern that presents itself in the RVU scam, generated by the back scratching committee of subspecialists in the RUC, is as follows:
- Cognitive only evaluations (Evaluation and Management, aka E&M) pay the least on a time based axis
- Difficult cognitive evaluations pay a tad more than easy ones on a time based axis
- All procedures pay handsomely on a time based axis when compared with E&M codes
- The easier the procedure, on a time based axis, the more it pays.
- The harder the procedure, on a time based axis, the less it pays.
- Inpatient, complex (non-hospitalist subsidized) E&M encounters.
- Inpatient, easy (non-hospitalist subsidized) E&M encounters
- Outpatient, complex patient E&M encounters
- Outpatient, easy patient E&M encounters
- Inpatient complex general surgical interventions (perfed belly middle of night)
- Inpatient easy general surgical interventions (lap chole)
- Inpatient medical based procedures, complex (AMI crashing/cath)
- In patient medical based procedures, easy (echo/dopplers/"chest pain" cath/ endoscopy/lines/stable angio)
- Inpatient subspecialty complex surgical interventions (tumor dissection with bulky mets on a 500# person)
- Inpatient subspecialty easy surgical interventions (TKA)
- Outpatient easy medical based procedures (you don't do complex procedures as an outpatient) (you name it)
- Outpatient general surgical interventions (again, only easy patients ) (you name it)
- Outpatient subspecialty surgery on easy patients (you name it)
- Successful cash only practice of any kind
- Outpatient cash only cosmetic interventions of any kind. Botox, boobs
And you wonder why no one wants to do outpatient internal medicine anymore. I don't blame them one bit. In the next post I will suggest why this needs to change and how to get there through WIN WIN
Thursday, June 4, 2009
Clean Up Your Stank Will Ya
________________________________ 11 OutburstsIf you're coming to the hospital to see your loved ones, the least you could do is.
- Be Sober
- Don't Stink
Thank God for the service elevators. If you're coming to the hospital to see your family, at least be respectful enough to clean up, even a little.
What Happened To The Promise Of No New Taxes?
________________________________ 14 OutburstsAt first, Obama said he wouldn't tax health care premiums. He blasted McCain for even considering it. Fast forward to Obama's current reality.
President Obama, in a pivot from some of his harshest campaign rhetoric, told Democratic senators yesterday that he is willing to consider taxing employer-sponsored health benefits to help pay for a broad expansion of coverage.
Goodbye promises. The ol' bait and switch at its finest. Where's the outrage? Taxing health care benefits? I'd say that puts the promise of no knew taxes on 95% of the population strongly out of reach.
Thinking ahead. When the average family of four is spending $30000 a year on health care insurance just a few years ahead, while making $60,000 a year, will you now make them pay $5,000-$10,000 a year in taxes on their benefits? Taking $10,000 a year per family out of the economy, redirecting it through a bureaucratic pit and then letting them decide how to spend it on health care?
That sounds like a genius plan to me.
Where do I sign up?
Wednesday, June 3, 2009
And I Thought Bush Was The Problem?
________________________________ 5 OutburstsIn a new audio statement aired by the al Jazeera Arab news channel on Wednesday, al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden accused President Barack Obama and his administration of “panting new seeds of hatred and vengeance towards America” by supporting the military operations against militants in Pakistan.
So You Want Social Solidarity? Show Me
________________________________ 29 Outbursts
So says a patients discharge summary.
There are significant barriers to this patient''s care. This 27 year old male has has no money for medications, no health insurance, no car and no stable living conditions. Happy's Hospital will set up transportation home through a private assistance program. All medications are $4 at Walmart.
Of course, as you could have guessed, the patient smokes two packs per day. And "will try" to quit.
So I ask you America, what are the responsibilities of the patient in this situation? Why should anyone care if the patient can't afford their medications while actively smoking? Should free care be offered through public assistance programs (Medicaid) without any responsibility from the patient to reduce their reliance on such program?(ie quit smoking)? Should hospitals and physicians be forced to provide free care at the expense of patient entitleditis?
At what point does personal responsibility trump social solidarity? FREE=MORE is taking takes us ever closer to a that North Korean Utopian society. We are a selfish people. Where all men were created equally selfish. Try finding a politician who leads for the good of society and not their constituency and I will show you a Medicaid patient who quit smoking to help pay for their own medications.
Under social solidarity, all Medicaid smokers would voluntarily quit smoking to help pay for their own health care needs. An act of sacrifice for the good of the nation. Of course that would be to mean. To harsh. To invasive, to ask those that receive the sweat of others to show some sacrifice of their own. Some doctors in Happy's town will waive or greatly reduce their fees for patients who show initiative towards self sacrifice and initiative. The fact that we find it appalling as a nation to ask for sacrifice from those that benefit from the sacrifices of others is reason enough for me to consider any talk of universal care to be nothing more than an exercise in FREE=MORE, not for social solidarity, but rather for an expanding case of entitleditis.
In what way should a Medicaid recipient show their social solidarity to the benefits they receive? I'm all ears. For starters, they should all get free Chantix.
The ACP Sells Out and a PCP Responds
________________________________ 6 OutburstsIn order to get to yes, the ACP has sold out its internist constituents in a hard leaning leftist pursuit of universal care, sacrificing the principles that separate internists from other less qualified providers of primary care. I discussed my views here. Over at the ACP Advocacy Blog, a reader, PCP, responded with a great rebuttle to an NP who feels empowered enough (I should say ignorant enough) to believe they carry the same capabilities in their training to practice internal medicine in its outpatient primary care form. It's a great comment filled with truth. I recommend you go over and check it out.
The part that rings so true, and what I have stated from the beginning, is that primary care is defined on an individual basis, and what is offered by a NP is vastly inferior in scope than what can be offered by an internist. This is no different than subspecialties who chose to limit their scope of specialty care. I have met many a cardiologist, gastroenterologist, general surgeon and subspecialty surgeon who says "That patient needs to go to the academic meccah." Doctors define their scope by their abilities, inspite of their training.
As PCP says in his/her response:
The resulting work being mostly care coordination for which an entitled ANP would feel him/herself adequate. That however does not define a General Internist role unless he/she chooses to limit themselves to that. If we are to truly recognize value in health care delivery, then part of that will be to restore General IM to its roots, and in this regard ANPs pale in comparison."
You see, my definition of primary care is not the same definition that NPs choose to use in their desire to feel adequate in the role of providing it independently. Which has been my position from the get go. Choosing to say that one practices primary care is limited by how one chooses to define it, which is determined by how capable one is to practice it, which is determined by ones training and education. Which in the case of the NP medical home model will be vastly inferior in scope and capability. Not because NPs are bad people. But because they aren't trained to practice internal medicine, which is at the heart of what good primary internal medicine care can offer: Comprehensive independent care in the form of physician directed rationing of resources based on their ability to provide a total care package.
Remember, before there were certifications in medical subspecialities there were only internists taking care of your ills. I am thankful everyday for my training in internal medicine. As I see outpatient medicine at the hands of qualified internists dying quickly, being replaced by a force of underqualified participants, who as PCP says, legislated instead of educated their way to patient care, I am glad I carry the knowledge base to guide myself and my family through the soon to come marginalization of outpatient medicine under Obamacare.
June Is Bustin' Out Over At Grand Rounds
________________________________ 1 OutburstsThe HealthBlawg takes June with a storm with this weeks Grand Rounds. I'm honored that a post of mine was included, as I didn't even submit one this week. Thanks Dawg.
Obama Says Health Care Reform Is Good For The Economy
________________________________ 4 OutburstsWow. What a great thought leader of our time. How did he get so smart?
Here’s how House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) saw things: “This report is nothing more than smoke and mirrors,” Boehner said, as quoted by Politico. “Everyone agrees that reducing the cost of health care would benefit our economy, but the administration hasn’t offered a credible plan to do so without raising taxes or rationing care.”
VTE Prevention Drug Rivaroxaban May Have To Wait
________________________________ 0 OutburstsThe oral anticoagulant that is waiting to revolutionize post orthopaedic VTE (venous thromboembolism) prevention will have to wait. Despite a 15-2 vote by an advisory panel to approve rivaroxaban (an oral Factor Xa inhibitor), the FDA is not yet ready to pass judgement.
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
Did You Know Kobe Bryant, George Clooney, Matt Damon, Johnny Depp, Brad Pitt, Will Smith, and Denzel Washington Are All Overweight?
________________________________ 0 OutburstsThe numbers don't add up for this mathematician, who says it's time to abandon the BMI as a measurement for obesity. Funny stuff. Who knew anyone gave this stuff much thought?
Oh Craps
________________________________ 0 OutburstsRemember the lady that rolled 154 times in a row earlier this year at the craps table? Some folks decided to calculate the odds.
Shackleford updated his calculation and settled on an estimate of 1 in 5.3 billion,explained here. That’s equivalent to a 95.6% free-throw shooter hitting 500 straight. Shackleford estimates there are about 50 million craps shooters’ turns per year in the U.S., which would mean DeMauro’s feat had about a 1% chance of happening this year.I'd place similar odds on the political will to reform America's entitlements responsibl for the bankrupting this country.
Full Steam Ahead Toward Mediocrity
________________________________ 0 OutburstsLife as a bumper sticker. The Panda Bear does it again.
Used to be that the most durable object on the planet was a bumper sticker. So durable that they often outlasted the car. In fact, you can still see the occasional Clinton-Gore offering, slightly faded but robust, grimly adherent to a lovingly maintained Nissan Sentra. I mention this because I still see the occasional Obama bumper sticker proudly displayed by the vestiges of those still in abject thrall of the Serpent King Ra-Obama and although it has been less than a year, the stickers are faded, peeling, and look like something printed hastily in some North Korean re-education camp before the entire shift was taken out and shot.
Are You Having Problems Leaving Comments?
________________________________ 2 OutburstsI received notice that a reader was having problems leaving comments. I have not noticed anything on my end. I have however noticed that when I try and leave a comment, it does not go through, but the comment, as typed, is still present in the que. You just have to hit the submit button one more time. I don't know why it does this. Just remember. If your comment does not post, it should still be there as typed. Just hit the submit button again.
Is Telemetry Overused?
________________________________ 24 OutburstsThe Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine asks the question.
Rule #1: Be Nice
________________________________ 14 OutburstsI try and follow this rule every single day.
I wrote this post a long time ago when I first started blogging. I’m recycling the post because this information bears repeating. I’ve been seeing some behavior lately that is inappropriate, and I’m telling you this stuff for your own good. Please, never roll your eyes at a nurse who is old enough to be your mother. She may be going through menopause, and it could be the last thing that you ever do. Just sayin.’ Don’t make waves at the nurses station.Doctor's save lives. Nurses save doctors and lives. Always remember to be nice to your nurse. Sometimes I fail, but I never forget when I do and it makes me try harder the next time.
Monday, June 1, 2009
Abortion Doctor Shot And Killed In Wichita
________________________________ 12 OutburstsDr George Tiller , who performs late term abortions, was shot and killed while ushering in church yesterday. This guy ha been through a lot. In 1985, his clinic was bombed. In 1993 he was shot in both arms. And what he's doing is all legal under Kansas law.
In March, Tiller was acquitted of 19 misdemeanor charges that he performed abortions illegally, failing to follow state law and obtain a second opinion on late-term abortions.
Under Kansas state law, abortion is legal only when a doctor affirms that the fetus can't live independently outside of the mother's womb, also known as determining viability. If the fetus is viable, two doctors must attest that the abortion is necessary for the well-being of the mother's physical or mental health.
Do Internists Have Confidence In Their Own Training When Compared To NPs?
________________________________ 5 OutburstsMy short answer is yes. I gave the rest of my answer to this question posed on the ACP Advocacy Blog where an excellent discussion is occurring. The American College of Physicians (ACP) has endorsed, and I shall say, fully short sighted endorsement, for the advancement of independent functioning medical home models managed by fully independent NPs.

















