Wednesday, January 28, 2009

"Micro Managing Morons" Says The Dinosaur

That's what Dr Dinosaur called us folk after she rants about guidelines and  the reality of real life medicine.  The gist of the post is well taken.  It's difficult to manage all patients with guideline driven medicine all the time.  In fact, I would say its very difficult to manage most patients with guideline driven medicine all of the time.  Obviously this fictional patient she speaks of in exquisite detail doesn't exists.  Perhaps he never had diabetes.  Perhaps he never had cancer.  Maybe he never had a problem swallowing pills.  Perhaps the whole thing is made up.

Your make believe patient was managed in a way that other doctors, me included, would not have.  I suppose there is more than one way to skin a cat.  And that's all fine and dandy.  That goes along well with the point of the post.  That guidelines aren't always appropriate.  At least I presented my rational for my thought process.

I suppose you can consider those that question the rational of your fake management decisions "micro managing morons".  I wouldn't.  I would consider it communication.  If you are going to present a fake patient, be prepared for others to present their opinions on your fake management skills.   Or better yet, disable the comments far sooner that you did in this case so your management skills stand without discussion.
Print Friendly and PDF
Blog Widget by LinkWithin

7 Outbursts:

  1. well i guess Dr Dinosaur is looking himself in a mirror by calling others morons by just an opinion. cancer is caused sometimes by imnunosupresion, diabetes can cause inmunsupresion, how can Dr Dinosaur prove the outcome of certain cancer on a diabetic patient while most of the studies given in cancer patients are in non diabetic people. maybe diabetes can accelerate the progress of the cancer, plus studies arent absolute, the % of developing cancer incresases with the time, sounds irrational, that there is a zero probability of cancer on a given time. what is the probability of developing a life treatinng infection after doing a surgery in patient with ac1 13 Vs the probability of developing cancer. risk and benefics, still the chances of developing an infection increases on the CURRENT glucose levels not in ac1 13 levels, cause hiperglicemia affects Leukocyte diapedesis it doesnt have to do with ac1 levels, which is a the formation of the amodori bodies, which takes time. meaning if you are a diabetic type II with current blog sugar 100 and ac1 13% you can perform a surgery with the same outcomes as a nondiabetic people in terms of getting an infection, i would like you to correct me about this if im wrong but thats what i learn from medical school in biology classes, as far as i can remember, diapedesis is altered by sugar levels not ac1 levels you can take medical decisions just in a single test, more when you dont know the basic grounds that hold certain tests, we see patients not tests.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Comments get shut down once the ad hominem attacks begin. Moving them to your own blog makes them no more honorable.

    ReplyDelete
  3. still is no reason enought to call people moron, for thinking diferent, would you call you collagues moron in a medical board, i doubt it, well maybe medical boards arent that straight foward cause is a face to face conversation.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It's rationale :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dinosaur acting smug. Imagine that.

    ReplyDelete
  6. These are complex questions (however dino has masked it). This is a patient best served being presented at a tumor board with rads, path, med onc, onc surgery, and dino. I don't know where dino got the idea that "it won't metastize in from 3-12 months" but frankly he (nor the surgeon he called) doesn't really "know that". Hopefully all will work out, if not the patient will suffer and dino may open himself up to (possibly deserved) legal ramifications.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree HHO. It's interesting that a difference of opinion in how one manages a complicated medical case can be construed as "ad hominem attacks" by certain bloggers....If your feelings are that sensitive there's an easy enough solution; don't present the case as written online.

    ReplyDelete

By Posting Here I Promise To Do Something Nice For Someone Today