Saturday, October 11, 2008

Critical Lab Values That Aren't Really Critical.

 As a hospitalist I get to see critical lab values every day. Patients come in sick. And their labs are often sick as well. Some of the most common criticals that are called to me include
  • low potassium or high potassium
  • high bicarbonate
  • low platelet count
  • low hemoglobin
  • INR
  • decreased urine output
This is my hit list of unnecessary pages and phone calls. Things that can wait until rounds. Things that get called at 4 am when I'm either sleeping or busy. Things that interrupt my daily rounds, pull me away from a patient and make me wait for 2-3 minutes on hold while the nurse comes to the phone.

These are critical lab values without critical thinking. What do I mean by that? In the ultimate wisdom of patient safety and hospital liability , very rigid and defined critical lab values are assigned to most labs. If a patient's value falls into the critical range, a phone call is placed from the lab to the nurse and from the nurse to me. If it's critical, it must be called. Everyone is covering their butts according to protocol, because of course, patient safety is the issue. Of course it is.

Unfortunately, patient safety is rarely an issue. It's a giant game of shifting liability. The lab documents they notified the nurse-->lab off the hook if something bad happens. The nurse notifies the doctor ---> nurse off the hook if something bad happens. Doctor is left with a critical value called 10 or 20 times a day, interrupting the entire flow of patient evaluations and discharges. Every time, I must stop what I'm doing and answer a page for a critical lab value, I lose valuable face time with patients. And it all adds up over the course of a day. I wouldn't have a problem with the system, except that critical thinking has been removed from the equation. The nurse is not allowed to make judgments as to whether a phone call is warranted or not.

As a default protocol of calling all critical lab values, the liability is shifted up the educational food chain, landing ultimately on the physician's lap. Often times a nurse is not allowed to not call a critical lab value. The problem is, what the hospital has defined as critical, does not apply to the vast majority of critical lab values reported. What's considered critical by hospital standards, is a normal or chronic value for the patient.

The low urine output gets me every time. Old people. 90 year olds with chronic kidney disease. I'm being called with decreased urine output. "Why?" I ask. She's 90. Her kidneys don't work well because they are 90 year old kidneys. Critical thinking allows a nurse to use their brain and make educated decisions on the importance of decreased urine output in a 90 year old with bad kidneys. Sometimes that critical thinking has left the building. Or perhaps hospital protocol fails to allow a nurse to use their skills. This has resulted in me writing an order not to call me decreased urine output.

The platelet and hemoglobin criticals are right up there with the most frequent time wasters. A hemoglobin of 8.5 is not critical when the last 7 days have the same value. A platelet count of 25K is not critical when the last seven days have the same value. A bad COPDer with a bicarb of 45 is not critical when that is their normal value for them. The problem is, hospital protocol often does not allow for nurses to use critical thinking. It's frustrating. All that wasted time spent documenting and paging and discussing things that don't need to be discussed urgently or otherwise.

So I define my own critical values. I write an order for the nurses not to call me. I find myself writing it more and more often. Don't call me that potassium value. Don't call me that hemoglobin or platelet count. Don't call me urine output. You are wasting your time and mine. Since nurses are forced to work like robots, I am forced to reprogram their input data. They have been stripped of their higher intelligence.    I like to say I have my very own fleet Roombas.  When you organize hospital systems around universal default mode, you fail to appreciate all the individual nuances that don't follow the rules and  that causes lots of unnecessary work for everyone involved.

What you may believe you are gaining in safety, you lose in efficiency, and that efficiency comes at a cost.  Resources that are pulled away from other pressing issues, like say, patient care.  It draws valuable resources and time away from everyone's busy schedule.  Part of being a hospitalist means addressing hospitalist efficiency issues, just like this one.  

The other day I spent an hour in a committee meeting full of highly trained professionals.  Nurses.  Directors.  Pharmacists.   Educated folks from across multiple disciplines.  And what did we do? We spent an hour meeting just to create a schedule going forward to have more meetings.   These meetings?  JCAHO mandated patient safety initiatives.  I suspect, when you take the combined salaries of the folks in the room,  you are looking at $500 an hour in resource utilization.  Now multiply these meetings by thousands of times a year across the whole hospital spectrum.  Do we want perfect care for a few? Or do we want affordable care for all?  You can't have both.  When you look at the pie chart of health care costs, you see hospitals are responsible for the largest chunk.  Physician fees pale in comparison to what you are paying in premiums to cover a catastrophic hospital stay.

The perfection being mandated by the never event policies and patient safety initiatives of the Medicare National Bank are paid for by you and me in the form of higher administrative costs that must be passed on to the consumer patient.  We can't have perfect and cheap because perfect comes at a cost.  Every mandate for perfection adds a layer of cost that is pricing many families and businesses out of the third party insurance market.   How long can  Joe Public afford $13,000 premiums for him and his family.  How long can Widget's R Us continue to pay them?

And you wonder why health care is so expensive. The cost structure for these behind the scenes unfunded perfection mandates by our government would blow your mind.  I experienced it first hand.  That 10 dollar Tylenol you get billed for is paying for 10 highly educated folks to meet for an hour, just to make a schedule of more meetings.

Lean and mean health care delivery it is not. It's a dinosaur.  Hospitals would never survive in the real world of real world economics.  But Medicare economics is not the real world.  It is government intervention.  It is socialism.  It is a gravy train of money that never ends.  But that party is ending.  The Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund went cash flow negative this year and is expected to be bankrupt in nine short years.  If you think this 700 Billion dollar bailout is a lot of money.  Try 60 trillion dollars in unfunded entitlements for your next generations.  Money that is currently promised, but doesn't exist.

Be afraid.  Be very, very afraid.  With that said, have a great weekend.  I'm off to ride roller coasters, Halloween style.
Print Friendly and PDF
Blog Widget by LinkWithin

18 Outbursts:

  1. Do we work together?? LOL
    I am the nurse portion of the critical values game. We get written up if we don't call a critical value within 1 hour of labs notification to us.

    At the beginning it was a rigid policy. Now, we can use our judgment a little bit and not call values that are "expected due to patient diagnosis", or "improved from prior critical result". The one that still really gets me: we have to call all critical culture results. Even when the MD has already noted "probably MRSA sepsis, will dose abx accordingly" and the blood culture is MRSA. We have to call the UDS that is positive for opiates when the patient has listed oxycontin as a home medication.

    We know it's stupid. Critical is the patient who had a hct of 34 6 hours ago and has a hct of 19 now.

    Anyway, we feel the pain too. I hate calling an MD at 2am for something we aren't going to do anything about.

    ReplyDelete
  2. funny you should mention that, just got woken up last night when my significant other was paged for slightly elevated potassium in a chronic dialysis who skipped his dialysis the previous day to go on a cocaine binge and then shoed up in the ER at 3am. The guy got lots of kexalate (sp?) and spent the morning in the bathroom.

    ReplyDelete
  3. this is your best post ever.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yeah, great post. I also wonder if the hospitals are trying to regiment nursing skills to the extent where they can justify eventually using non-licensed people. If the job is minutely protocoled to the slightest detail with no room for our education or common sense, then why not hire some high school grad for 10 bucks an hour.

    It's a big part why I went to agency. I stay under the radar. When they find out that I always "forget" to write WRV (whatever that means) by my phone orders I'm long gone to the next unit.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You don't have your own fleet of anything. Nurses work for the hospital and the patients, not for doctors.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Other than that, I agree with you.

    ReplyDelete
  7. while there are nurses that understand the difference, sadly there are some nurses who will call with those labs and not know the difference!

    ReplyDelete
  8. My "favorite" critical value is for INR. I've been called multiple times for INR values from 2 to 3 in patients on warfarin.

    ReplyDelete
  9. As a former lab medical director, I'd just like to say this issue is not as simple as it seems. As far as hb/hct levels, our lab wouldn't call it as critical if it was within a certain previous range for that patient. Also, critical values are supposed to be established with the involvement and approval of the med exec committee, so complain to them if you have a problem.
    I have seen many, many cases where truly critical values were called from the lab to the floor, but later not appropriately acted upon or ignored by the doc. The judgement allowed by nursing is another factor; I agree with a previous commenter that while some nurses can make this judgement, some cannot or do not have their "head in the game" enough to be cerebrating about it.
    So while it may be a pain in the butt from your end, establishing a foolproof way for this information to be transmitted in a timely manner is truly not that simple. Any suggestions that solve the problem for the whole system and not just your individual practice sphere would be helpful.

    ReplyDelete
  10. We almost never have to call the doctor over critical values. We have parameters for everything and if we have a parameter to treat a critical value, it doesn't need to be called. A critical plt count for us is <10, and <7 for a hgb, but we have transfusion parameters so we don't need to call it. We have an electrolyte protocol to cover phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, and ionized calcium values. We get orders for FFP based on INRs.

    It's a beautiful thing.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Amen from another RN. I love doctors that write parameters and "call if <" or "do not call unless >" with every order.

    Can I just say also I would LOVE if the nurses could use their CRITICAL thinking and offer patients over-the counter medications like milk of magnesia, motrin and cough drops without calling the doctor. I mean, I suppose any of those meds *could* be a problem in certain patients but can't we just run things through pharmacy instead, like fax something down at 2am that says, "Pt X is just here for a lap hyst, denies allergy to Motrin, no bleeding problems, last labs were this, doc forgot to check the box, can I give?" Isn't there some way we can do this.

    Doctors are SO MAD when I call in the middle of the night for something stupid but I can't just prescribe things by myself. Just yesterday, it took nearly two hours to FINALLY get some antiemetics to a nauseous post op (she came over with none on order!) and the doc told the patient, "Oh I don't know why the nurse didn't GO AHEAD AND GIVE YOU SOMETHING ANYWAY" when the patient complained. Um, no I'm not allowed to assume that you would ok the medication and give it.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I am a former med tech who has had to call numerous crtical values to docs and nurses who could care less (for the reasons you mention-who know when results for a patient are truly critical). Calling wasted a lot of my time, mostly spent on hold as the appropriate person was found. However, all lab results were reviewed and if no documentation of call was made for critical values, it was a write up!

    ReplyDelete
  13. I guess something like an email to a blackberry wouldn't work for notification, or would it?

    ReplyDelete
  14. When we got dinged by TJC on our last audit over critical values, I was part of a committee working to find a solution to appease the Joint folks and prove that we were following up on criticals. The nice thing is that we built in a way to say that the reported critical was "expected, MD not notified", for like a dialysis patient with a Cr of 6 (down from 10). It allows us (the nurses) to utilize our critical thinking skills. It's not a perfect solution, but it gives us some lee-way.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anon- we can do something similar to what you mention. We can, through the hospital's internal website, send a text message to the doctor, then the doctor can put in an order at any computer.

    Again, a beautiful thing.

    ReplyDelete
  16. My favorite thing is when my lab calls with a critical value and then won't tell me what it is. "I'll be in the computer soon." I am then left to guess a)which lab is off, and b) which way, and c) by how much. The other day, I had this very discussion with the lab folks, who are bound by this stupid protocol. I managed to get out that the hemoglobin was "imcompatable with life" and "less than 3" but they wouldn't tell me exactly. BTW, she did fine. Just a little short of breath and weak.

    Oh, and a real fleet of Roombas is much more fun. I love having my own droid army.

    -AnERPitDoc

    ReplyDelete
  17. While I agree w/ the concept, texting critical values can't satisfy the "powers that be" b/c there is no way to verify the info was received by the target ... unless you actually reply, which means the doc had to interrupt his current action, or wake up, anyway ...

    We definitely need to change the way we handle criticals, but as "former lab director" said it is not so simple, but Happy is more right aboutthe main issue being liability not healthcare and it is a net negative to the system ....

    ReplyDelete
  18. hahahaha...the other day the Charge told me to CALL for a low Mag. I said I was NOT calling for a low mag, because the patient was on the electrolyte protocol...hence the reason it was low...I was about to give mag. The Dr. will see it when he does rounds....

    She just couldn't or wouldn't understand...she wrote an occurance report on me!
    She's an Old School Nurse...I'm a newer school nurse and often like to think.

    hahahaha
    my first occurance report. I refuse to call a D. at 445 am for something that is expected,especially when they will be in at 645am

    ReplyDelete

By Posting Here I Promise To Do Something Nice For Someone Today